If you’re like me this Pandemic was a seriously disturbing event & I don’t mean because there was a virus from China spreading around the globe. What I’m talking about is the dystopian measures & never before used health guidelines employed for this virus & pandemic versus others in history.
I simply could not understand why the Government, Health Authorities & Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) were reacting to this pandemic in such a different manner than the traditional procedures, protocols & treatments for a respiratory virus whether it is a common Cold or Flu. Keep in mind the Common Flu is a Coronavirus in the same family of Coronaviruses as SARS & SARS-CoV-2. With that consideration I was in utter dismay watching the Health Authorities make decisions on public health measures & treatments for this pandemic such as the Lockdowns – enforceable by heavy fines, Business closures – but only the “Mom & Pop” small businesses, Social distancing – we recently found out there was no science behind it & constant fear messaging from the mainstream news – Hospitals are full & Dead people everywhere. Do you remember that?
COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Even according to the WHO’s own webpage linked above this is a disease which will be mild for most people & it affects the elderly & immunocompromised much more than healthy adults & the young however, that is not what you would conclude judging by how the authorities reacted:
The above are clearly examples of a society heading toward Dystopia
Something seemed off about this whole pandemic & I decided to do a little digging to find the Truth behind the Official Narrative – what I found was shocking & deeply disturbing.
If I had not been skeptical & interested in seeking the Truth I would have never started asking questions or doing my own research.
And that is why I’ve created this website & this page specifically discussing TRUTH.
Below I will go into great detail explaining what Truth is & how you can separate that from opinion & personal bias or perspective. I will also get into Ethics, Morality & human behavior in a society.
You will need to understand what is Truth before you are willing to accept the information I share later on about this pandemic. If you do not understand human behavior you will find it nearly impossible believe the gross negligence & even genocidal behavior that took place during this pandemic.
Yes – it’s that bad!
This Pandemic was a serious Wake Up Call for me & I want to share what I discovered while digging for the Truth.
OK so …
What is Truth?
We often hear other people speak about the “Truth” however, most hear this & instinctively scoff at the claim unless they happen to agree with the assertions being promoted by the person.
Many people believe Truth is subjective & can change from one person to another.
These people claim to have their “Own Truth” & believe that we each have our own truth & should speak only Our Truth rather than regurgitating other’s truths. You’ll see why this is a flawed ideology below.
I see this individual truth claim as an attempt to avoid personal responsibility & Critical Thinking.
Let’s take a moment to define Critical Thinking:
Critical thinking is the analysis of available facts, evidence, observations, and arguments in order to form a judgement by the application of rational, skeptical, and unbiased analyses and evaluation.[1] The application of critical thinking includes self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective habits of the mind,[2] thus a critical thinker is a person who practices the skills of critical thinking or has been trained and educated in its disciplines.[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_thinking
Do most people practice Critical Thinking or do they just adopt the same perspective & ideology as their family, friends & coworkers? Or perhaps, they dutifully believe anything that comes from an authority figure?
Whether information comes from Government officials on TV, News Headlines, newspaper columns, articles written in a magazine, chat over coffee at work or a street corner preacher speaking on top of his “soap box” your proclivity toward accepting something as True depends on your personal perspective.
Most people do not spend much time contemplating whether or not something is True & the reason for this is a general cognitive malaise in which most of society seems to accept unanimity or majority opinion.
Additionally, the source of the information will have a profound impact on whether or not you accept the veracity of any claims about Truth.
For example – put a lab coat & stethoscope on a man speaking & he instantly gains credibility as a medical professional despite being a paid actor – it’s all about image & perspective.
–
Trust in the source is essential before accepting the validity of the information. And that leads one to ponder “What is a Trusted Source?”
How do we determine what or who is Trustworthy?
It is my observation that most of society does not give the requisite thought toward this question & merely follows the crowd in their opinion of who they Trust & what is Truth.
Why that is exactly I cannot say for sure but I suspect it has something to do with discipline. As the official definition above states Critical Thinking is a discipline.
Let’s be honest with each other – MOST people are lazy!
We would rather do something “Fun” than tedious –
"A Bad Day Fishing is Better than a Good Day at Work!"
But I think we are not just lazy when it comes to work – as I mentioned above we tend to be lazy thinkers too. Cognitive Malaise is not just lazy thinking but actually something a bit more complex.
Malaise in society can be described as – a complex of problems facing a country.
“A vague sense of mental or moral ill-being. A malaise of cynicism and despair.”
– Malcolm Boyd
This means that people can become exacerbated by the issues overwhelming their life which tends to spread through the community, city, province or state & eventually the whole country is affected – you could even say infected. (like a virus)
When life becomes difficult for the majority of people it can create a pandemic of thought where people struggle with reality & ignore or putt off issues rather than deal with them, it’s an unfortunate coping mechanism.
Now, for a moment – think about the Pandemic –
- Was it stressful?
- Were you confident, confused or even scared during the pandemic?
- Was your daily routine upset by lockdowns, social distancing, arrows on the floors, Mask muzzling, constant hand sanitizing & fighting for Toilet Paper in the grocery stores?
Do you remember the “Panic Buying“?
What does a stressful situation do to peoples capacity for thinking about issues?
I’ve seen several people have “panic attacks” as they struggle to deal with situations.
But what I’ve seen far more of than panic or stressed thinking is cognitive malaise – the tendency to just dismiss or avoid the disciplined effort for thinking critically & instead “Go With the Flow” – ie. do what others are doing.
This is when our emotional state exacerbates our mental state which affects our ability for Critical Thinking and when that happens we see people engaging in Group Think.
Group Think is not necessarily a bad thing (not a good thing either) however, it has led to some rather regrettable, tumultuous events such as Protests, Raucous Mobs & if taken to the extreme – Rioting & Lynching. – We all remember the George Floyd & Jacob Blake riots.
–
Where does this tendency to escalate a common ideology to the level of violent behavior come from?
I would postulate that this communal proclivity toward Group Think causes many in our society to suffer a Crisis of Conscience.
A crisis of conscience is a situation when people are confused between right and wrong.
https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/crisis-of-conscience/
And, of course, this crisis of conscience is merely a symptom telling us there’s something not quite right in our society. – So, let’s explore this further below & see what might be the root cause.
–
Conformity and Social norms – how it affects Ethics & Truth
Conformity is the tendency for an individual to align their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors with those of the people around them. Conformity can take the form of overt social pressure or subtler, unconscious influence.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/conformity
Social norms are developed from Conformity.
When Conformity goes wrong it usually violates Ethics, Ethical behaviour & the Truth.
Asch’s Conformity Experiment on Groupthink
Ethics do not come from Conformity nor Social norms. Many believe ethical standards are established by conformity and social norms, however this is not True. In fact, it is often argued that what is ethical can be in direct opposition to what is common or socially normal.
Ethics has an entire branch of philosophy & it encompasses thorough debate over what is Right & Wrong.
In a nutshell – what is Normal – has no bearing on what is Ethical.
–
Ethics and Truth
Why should we care about being Ethical if we are just doing what everyone else is doing?
If you don’t follow the Crowd you won’t be Popular & that will seriously affect your Social Life.
So, Why does Ethics & Truth matter?
Simple answer is:
If you do not care about Truth you are Living a Lie.
We do not get to choose what is Right or Wrong it’s a matter of Ethics in humanity.
Ethics is based on Moral Values & Virtues – something that separates us from Animals.
Right or Wrong is based on Truth – something as simple as 2+2 = 4 = True = Right
This is known as Natural Law
Natural Law is a system of right or justice held to be common to all humans and derived from nature rather than from the rules of society.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/natural-law
With Natural Law as the foundation of a society you can establish universal rules that do not depend on opinion, religion, preference or biased ideology.
Natural Law transcends individual beliefs & is instead rooted in what is universally known & accepted as – The Facts of Life.
If people truly believe in Natural Law they would only do Ethical &, Moral things – Right?
You would expect people to act ethical & be moral however, what we have seen time after time is people doing unethical & even horrible things to nature itself & other human beings. – Why?
–
Ethical Behavior – a social examination
Behavioural Scientists have been interested in discovering how people think & what influences their actions for well over a hundred years.
In the 1960s Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram famously carried out a series of experiments that forever changed our perceptions of morality and free will.
Milgram wanted to understand what drove Germans to follow Hitler during the second World War.
Milgram examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II, Nuremberg War Criminal trials.
Their defense often was based on “obedience” – that they were just following orders from their superiors.
Milgram wanted to investigate whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority figures, as this was a common explanation for Nazi actions in World War II.
The experiments began in July 1961, a year after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiment to answer the question:
“Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following
– Milgram, 1974
orders? Could we call them all accomplices?”
Milgram selected participants for his experiment by newspaper advertising for male participants to take part in a study of learning at Yale University.
The procedure was that the participant was paired with another person and they drew lots to find out who would be the ‘learner’ and who would be the ‘teacher.’ The draw was fixed so that the participant was always the teacher, and the learner was one of Milgram’s assistants (pretending to be a real participant).
The subjects – or “teachers” – were instructed to administer electroshocks to a human “learner,” with the shocks becoming progressively more powerful and painful.
Controversial at the time but now strongly vindicated by the scientific community, these experiments attempted to determine to what extent people will obey orders from authority figures regardless of consequences.
“Milgram’s experiments on obedience have made us more aware of the dangers of uncritically accepting authority,”
– Peter Singer – New York Times Book Review.
This is why you should question authority!
– Watch – Solomon Asch, Conformity Experiment – The Line Between Independence And Conformity –
here: https://rumble.com/v1boplf-solomon-asch-conformity-experiment-the-line-between-independence-and-confor.html
– Watch – The Stanford Prison Experiment –
here: https://rumble.com/v1r52h8-the-stanford-prison-experiment.html
– Watch – Herding Behavior: How Following The Crowd Leads Us Astray –
here: https://rumble.com/v1boufv-herding-behavior-how-following-the-crowd-leads-us-astray.html
“There was a time, I suspect, when men and women could give a fully human response to any situation, when we could be fully absorbed, in the world, as human beings, but more often now people don’t get to see the whole situation but only some small part of it. There’s a division of labour and people carry out small, narrow, specialised jobs and we can’t act without some sort of direction from on high. I call this the agentic state. The individual yields to authority and in doing so becomes alienated from his own actions. The agentic state is ‘store policy’, it’s ‘I’m just doing my job’, or ‘that’s not my job’, or ‘I don’t make the rules’, ‘we don’t do that here’. ‘just following orders’, ‘it’s the law’. In the agentic state the individual defines himself as an instrument carrying out the wishes of others – a soldier, a nurse, an administrator, an actor, a corporate employee, or even, yes, academics and artists.”
– Stanley Milgram
“I believe we are puppets with perception, with awareness. Sometimes we can see the strings. And perhaps our awareness is the first step in our liberation.”
– Stanley Milgram
“How do civilized human beings participate in destructive, inhumane acts? How was genocide implemented so systematically, so efficiently? And how did the perpetrators of these murders live with themselves?”
– Stanley Milgram
This Pandemic exposed our Humanity.
We Failed the Test!
How do we fix this & get back to a more sane & ethical society?
We Need The TRUTH!
We need to Learn the Truth, Speak the Truth & Practice the Truth.
Far too many people believe anything they are told by an authority or news anchor on TV.
The “Official Narrative” is propaganda by definition and people need to use critical thinking about the information they are being fed through the media, which includes the Mainstream Media such as Television, Radio, Newspapers & Movies. It goes beyond that however, you also have clever targeted advertising & messaging in magazines, newspapers, billboards, YouTube, TikTok, & social media platforms. The vast majority of people are completely unaware how Machiavellian messaging can be.
You need to be wary of what information forms your opinions which means challenging the veracity of the Official Narrative.
Tragically, any who do not promote the Official Narrative have been ridiculed, harassed, censored often removed from social media & social messaging platforms. Some even had their Wikipedia pages either changed to label them a “Conspiracy Theorist”, “Anti-vaxxer” or other aspersion. Some have their pages deleted all together. Even worse – many have lost their jobs.
This website & specifically the About Covid page, is intended to present the reader with information that is rarely if ever seen on the mainstream media. The information is presented in a manner that will help you understand that the government & many institutions have previously & presently continue to spread misinformation to the public. This website will also teach people how the authorities & institutions have spread misinformation & why they are doing it.
My goal in creating this website is to Wake People Up from their aloof lassitude & help them to see the truth behind the veil of propaganda & secrecy used by government, authorities, institutions & corporations.
Below I will show you information that proves the government, authorities, institutions & corporations have committed, participated in or endorsed egregious unethical & unscrupulous acts against their own people throughout history & many of you will be shocked to discover the extent of their malfeasance.
I will show you clear examples which will help you to discover the nefarious history of Governments, Medical/Health Institutions & Corporations.
This will lead us to the current Covid situation and help you learn about who we can & cannot trust & why.
Please open your mind to the possibility that you have been Misled & Lied to for many years.
I encourage you to not blindly trust what I am telling you but do as I did – Research!
Question Everything!
Do your own digging to find what is true – but be careful to not allow opinion, personal preference & bias to corrupt the truth.
TRUE science is formed from open debate & stands the test of scrutiny.
Quite literally – the Best science is that which has been argued over & debated thoroughly to ensure the integrity of the data, process & conclusions derived.
THAT is how we determine Truth, it only comes from an open & transparent process & policy.
You will see information here that is not shown on the mainstream media – you will find the videos & documentation to be highly credible, factual & verifiable enough to withstand scrutiny in a court of law.
I would like to state categorically that the information compiled on this & the About Covid page have been vetted & vigorously checked to confirm the data presented is reliable & trustworthy.
To date there are numerous legal teams using the data provided to argue their cases in court. And – to date in NONE of those cases has the data been proven false.
People depend on other people for their survival, that is how humans have evolved & survived for thousands of years. Being able to rely on & trust others is essential to a society.
Trust comes from Truth over time & that trust must be earned.
Before this pandemic the Government (Congress) & Medical institutions were among the least trusted entities in North America. – In 2019 Government had only 11% approval & Medical slightly better at 36%
Miraculously – soon after the pandemic started those same institutions were telling us to Trust them … and – the vast majority of us did out of blind faith, fear & desperation.
Is it SAFE to Trust our Governments?
The CIA has long played the international game of propaganda required by an intelligence agency, but during the Cold War, the Agency paid and intimidated American and other journalists into helping promote its messages.
Famous Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein broke the story in 1977 for Rolling Stone. Bernstein revealed the workings of Operation Mockingbird, in which many journalists – included Pulitzer Prize winners – joined the CIA’s payroll, writing fake stories to disseminate the agency’s Agitprop and providing intelligence.
Other journalists were threatened and blackmailed into cooperating with Mockingbird, and many were given falsified or fabricated information about their actions in order to engender their support for the CIA’s mission.
The idea of a large organisation controlling the minds and thoughts of individuals, pushing them towards a specific ideology and certain life choices, may seem like science fiction, or an absurd conspiracy that can be found in paperback books or movies. However, for some, it is certainly not a surprising discovery that corporations, organisations and politicians, manipulate public opinion in order to fit certain agendas.
The public at large is part of a mass propaganda operation unwittingly being manipulated by powerful organisations, such as the government itself.
Operation Mockingbird program has never been officially discontinued.
http://schoolhistory.co.uk/notes/operation-mockingbird/
Media Is Controlled
Project MK Ultra
Project MKULTRA (also known as MK-ULTRA) was the code name for a CIA mind-control research program that began in the 1950s. There is much published evidence that the project involved not only the use of drugs to manipulate subjects, but also electroshock and the use of electronic signals to alter brain functioning.
It was first brought to wide public attention by the U.S. Congress (in the form of the Church Committee) and a presidential commission (known as the Rockefeller Commission) and also to the U.S. Senate.
The Deputy Director of the CIA revealed that over 30 universities and institutions were involved in an ‘extensive testing and experimentation’ program which included covert drug tests on unwitting citizens ‘at all social levels, high and low, native Americans and foreign.’ Several of these tests involved the administration of LSD to ‘unwitting subjects in social situations.’ At least one death, that of Dr. Olson, resulted from these activities. The Agency itself acknowledged that these tests made little scientific sense. The agents doing the monitoring were not qualified scientific observers.
The project began as an attempt by the US to devise mind control and interrogation techniques following the Korean War. American soldiers were returning home from Chinese captivity seemingly ‘brainwashed’—disillusioned with American values and overtaken by communist thoughts. The CIA began to believe that foreign powers possessed methods of mind control that had allowed them to brainwash American prisoners of war.
“We had become pretty well convinced after the experience of the brainwashing problems coming out of China, that it was the techniques of the interrogators that were causing the individuals to make confessions […],” said John Gittinger, a CIA psychologist, in a testimony from a 1977 joint Senate hearing.
The CIA was initially interested in discovering a ‘truth serum.’ At the time, many believed in the possibility of a drug to use in interrogations that would eliminate all inhibitions, and prompt subjects to speak without reticence. The CIA first experimented with the use of LSD with little luck, and later delved into different types of psychotherapy and hypnosis in the hopes of discovering the secret of mind control.
The Canadian Connection
Out of the research and experiments that were undertaken within hospitals and laboratories, those that took place at McGill University in Canada, known as MK ULTRA subproject 68, were perhaps the most notorious. Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron was the head of McGill’s Allan Memorial Institute when the experiments were performed, and the main researcher implicated in the project.
According to information from the 1977 Senate hearing, most of the researchers and doctors involved in Project MK ULTRA, including Cameron, were not informed of the project or of the fact that the funds for their research originated from the spy agency. In order to conceal the source of money, the CIA created research foundations, such as the Human Ecology Fund, to act as fronts for funnelling MK ULTRA research funds. The CIA then worked through such organizations to target researchers with projects that were of interest to them in developing techniques of interrogation or human behaviour control.
For the CIA, Cameron’s research was potentially the answer they had been looking for.
It was exposed during trial that the Canadian government had provided even more funding to Cameron, and for a longer period, than the CIA.
McGill University seems to be trying to erase this history from its past. There is also no mention of this history on the university’s official website.
Operation Gladio – Declassified CIA Documents
Operation Northwoods
In the early 1960s, America’s top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. The plans were presented to President Kennedy’s defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But were rejected and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years.
The US military devised a plan intended to provoke war with Havana and get rid of Soviet ally Fidel Castro. Plans were drafted in early 1960s to create chaos in US cities, hoodwinking the American public and the international community, believing it would drum up public support for a war against Cuba.
Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
In 1962, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, headed by General Lyman Lemnitzer, unanimously proposed state-sponsored acts of terrorism on American soil, against its own citizens. The head of every branch of the US Armed Forces gave written approval to sink US ships, shoot down hijacked American planes, and gun down and bomb civilians on the streets of Washington, D.C., and Miami. The plan was only overturned when President Kennedy refused to endorse it. The concept of Operation Northwoods was to engineer a situation where the blame for the (self-inflicted) terrorism would fall on Cuba’s leader, Fidel Castro, after which the American public would beg and scream for the Marines to storm Havana.
America’s top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: “We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba,” and, “casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.“
Details of the plans are described in Body of Secrets (Doubleday), a new book by investigative reporter James Bamford about the history of America’s largest spy agency, the National Security Agency. However, the plans were not connected to the agency, he notes.
“These were Joint Chiefs of Staff documents. The reason these were held secret for so long is the Joint Chiefs never wanted to give these up because they were so embarrassing,” Bamford told ABCNEWS.com.
“The whole point of a democracy is to have leaders responding to the public will, and here this is the complete reverse, the military trying to trick the American people into a war that they want but that nobody else wants.“
The documents show “the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government,” writes Bamford.
The Joint Chiefs even proposed using the potential death of astronaut John Glenn during the first attempt to put an American into orbit as a false pretext for war with Cuba, the documents show.
Should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, they wrote, “the objective is to provide irrevocable proof … that the fault lies with the Communists et all Cuba [sic].”
The plans were motivated by an intense desire among senior military leaders to depose Castro, who seized power in 1959 to become the first communist leader in the Western Hemisphere — only 90 miles from U.S. shores.
The earlier CIA-backed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba by Cuban exiles had been a disastrous failure, in which the military was not allowed to provide firepower. The military leaders now wanted a shot at it.
“The whole thing was so bizarre,” says Bamford, noting public and international support would be needed for an invasion, but apparently neither the American public, nor the Cuban public, wanted to see U.S. troops deployed to drive out Castro.
When your government is willing to sacrifice it’s own citizens to start a war you have to re-think your trust in government.
Watch this video to see the 10 Craziest CIA Covert Operations: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPL0U1JGe8E
The History of Biological Warfare
–
An Early 1950’s Propaganda Film about Biological Warfare
–
Ft. Detrick Biological Warfare Program 1950s Maryland US Army
Bioweapons Tests on Mexico
https://www.cienciaydemocracia.com/articulosenlinea/bioweapons.html
25 Strangest Human Experiments Ever Conducted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2srfYhD_2o
Would the Government Really Experiment On It’s Own People?
Operation Big City – 1956
GUINEA PIG KIDS – Fauci’s Deadly Forced Experiments On Orphan Children
The Horrors of the Tuskegee Experiment – A Short Documentary
–
Infected!
How The US Carried Out Unethical & Horrific Studies On People In Guatemala
–
Atomic Soldiers
– What Does a Nuclear Bomb Explosion Feel Like?
–
When The US MELTED Its Own Soldiers Using Poisonous Gas
–
The Plutonium Files – Radiation Experiments on US Citizens
–
The CIA Murder that Exposed MK-ULTRA – The Frank Olson Assassination
–
5 Most Disturbing & Unethical Human Experiments
–
Experiments Gone HORRIBLY Wrong – Iceberg
Clearly, the above stories show the government is not deserving of our Trust.
–
So, there you have it – Multiple examples of the Unethical, Immoral, Inhumane & Heinous things Governments have done in the past that we know are verified FACT!
The same things that most of you previously thought were Crazy Conspiracy Theories or had no knowledge of before – you now know are absolutely TRUE.
Now – let’s have a look at this Pandemic – what do you know or THINK you know about the Pandemic & Covid?
I am going to share information that you may find almost impossible to believe – however, after watching the above videos & reading the stories linked you should be fairly shocked already & more willing to understand & accept the TRUTH I am about to reveal.
–
- The SARS-CoV-2 Virus (“The Virus”) came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology Lab.
- The first people infected with the Virus were workers at the Lab.
- The Virus is a direct result of US Department of Defense (DoD) funded Gain of Function research.
- The Chinese CCP & Military (PLA) were involved in the research & development program.
- The Virus is a BIOWEAPON.
- At the same time the Virus was created they began research on a “countermeasure” (vaccine).
- The research on Coronaviruses has been ongoing since BEFORE 2011.
- Labs in US, Fort Detrick, Canada, Winnipeg, Germany & Ukraine were all involved.
- Hunter Biden & by extension Joe Biden invested in the Ukrainian lab research.
- Hundreds of MILLIONS taxpayer dollars were spent on GoF research Despite a Moratorium since 2014.
- Fauci LIED multiple times before congress about the Origin of The Virus.
- Fauci LIED about Gain of Function research funding.
- Fauci LIED about the Covid vaccines.
- Fauci LIED about Masks.
- Fauci LIED about Remdesivir.
- Lockdowns were NOT based on scientific data.
- Social Distancing was NOT based on scientific data.
- The Government (all of them) LIED about “Safe & Effective”.
- The PCR Tests were Greatly Manipulated to produce FALSE positives for Covid infection.
- The PCR Tests have been withdrawn because they were NOT fit for purpose.
- The mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA plasmids & a cancer-promoting gene (SV40)
- The vaccines did NOT stop infection.
- The vaccines did NOT stop transmission.
- Of the nearly 6 BILLION people who took the vaccines NONE of them had Informed Consent
- There was absolutely ZERO justification for Vaccine Mandates!
- The Vaccine Pass, Passports & Cards were ALL ILLEGAL & an Egregious Violation of Human Rights.
How COVID Protocols Turned Hospitals Into . . . . . . Death Traps
Whistle-blower exposes the Fraud & Malfeasance in the Healthcare system during Covid:
https://x.com/denisrancourt/status/1742249326145880104?s=20
They LIED to YOU about Ivermectin!
https://rumble.com/v2m2yf6-the-truth-about-ivermectin.html
Full Measure With Sharyl Attkisson – Covid Concerns
–
The Biggest Crime in The History of Medicine!
–
Doctor Sitting on Congressional Hearing Grills Dr. Fauci on His Comments
–
AstraZeneca Admitted In Court That Their Vaccine Can Cause Harm!
–
Fauci Has Lied Repeatedly & STILL Some Refuse To See The Truth
–
Most Misinformation Came From “Trusted” Sources – They Lied – It Was Mass Propaganda
It is Important to Understand that ALL Free people in a Democratic Society Must Realize that Their God Given Rights & Freedoms are Necessary for Them to Thrive & Develop Into a Democracy that Represents it’s People Giving the Right to Question Authority & Demand Transparent Justice for All.
–
Many have forgotten or are completely unaware that the Canadian Government has a shocking history of failing Canadians.
The Eugenics Movement
It was Charles Darwin’s cousin Francis Galton who coined the term eugenics in 1883, following the publication of his book Hereditary Genius in 1869. It was derived from the Greek root meaning “good in birth” or “noble in heredity” to describe his utopian scheme.
Eugenics was, he said, “a brief word to express the science of improving stock, which is by no means confined to questions of judicious mating, but which, especially in the case of man, takes cognizance of all influences that tend in however remote a degree to give to the more suitable races or strains of blood a better chance of prevailing speedily over the less suitable than they otherwise would have had.”
So convinced was he of the flawlessness of his theory, he believed “its principles ought to become one of the dominant motives in a civilized nation, much as if they were one of its religious tenets.”
Alberta and British Columbia are the only provinces where, for a number of years, the government sterilized mentally ill men and women without their consent.
The science of eugenics, which came into prominence during the late nineteenth century, was concerned with improving the human race. Eugenicists believed that natural selection was insufficient, and they sought to influence human evolution by weeding out undesirables. A combination of heavy immigration and a fear that undesirables were reproducing at a high rate contributed to the popularization of eugenics in Canada. Such well-known figures as Emily Murphy and J.S. Woodsworth were avowed eugenicists.
The United Farm Women of Alberta, which was at the forefront of lobbying for sterilization laws, embraced “the ambitious goal of remodeling society through social improvements … The group emphasized well-raised and genetically ‘superior’ children as the hope for a future utopian society.” [Clément 2012] Alberta’s 1928 Sexual Sterilization Act created a Eugenics Board that was empowered to recommend sterilization as a condition for release from a mental health institution. The purpose was to ensure that “the danger of procreation with its attendant risk of multiplification of the evil by transmission of the disability to progeny were eliminated.” [Clément 2012] An amendment in 1937 permitted the sterilization of “mental defectives” without their consent.
Support for Eugenics in Canada
In the early 20th century, eugenic policies were considered progressive among many Canadians, including some socialists, feminists, farmers and psychiatrists. Their assumption was that Canadian society could be improved by encouraging reproduction among certain groups — particularly Anglo-Saxon Protestants — and discouraging or limiting reproduction among other groups, including Eastern European immigrants and, increasingly, Indigenous people. (Similarly, immigration policies like the Chinese head tax were aimed at limiting the population of Asian Canadians.)
Between 1928 and 1972, the Alberta Eugenics Board approved 99 percent of its 4,785 cases. Over time, increasing numbers of its decisions involved people who did not give their consent. And it was clearly biased against young adults (twenty- to twenty-four-year-olds), women, and Aboriginals (Aboriginals were also more likely to be diagnosed as mentally defective). Even in cases where agreement was obtained, it is impossible to know how many people were coerced into consenting. This is particularly true for women, who bear the burden of carrying children and are typically responsible for their care.
The forced sterilization of mentally ill people was obviously inconsistent with the principles of the rights revolution. Thus, it is no surprise that Alberta’s Peter Lougheed government, which had already introduced wide-ranging human rights legislation and was preparing to remove restrictions against Hutterites, eliminated the Sexual Sterilization Act in 1972.
Speaking before the legislature, Premier Lougheed explained that “we feel very, very strongly that the [act] is offensive and at odds with the proposed Bill of Rights.” Alberta MLA David King, who introduced a bill to repeal the act, noted succinctly at its second reading, “I come finally to the last [reason] which, for me personally, is the most compelling. That is, simply, that the act violates fundamental human rights. We are provided with an act, the basis of which is a presumption that society, or at least the government, knows what kind of people can be allowed children and what kinds of people cannot … It is our view that this is a reprehensible and intolerable philosophy and program for this province and this government.” [Clément 2012]
“Extermination must be put on a scientific basis if it is ever to be carried out humanely.”
“If we desire a certain type of civilization and culture, we must exterminate the sort of people who do not fit it.”
– George Bernard Shaw
.
For More Information go here: